tih00010600

Text-inc Id:

tih00010600

Bod-inc Id:

H-006

Headings:

Heimericus de Campo Promptuarium argumentorum.

Analysis of content:

1. A1r [Title-page.] ‘Promptuarium argumentorum dialogice ordinatorum a duobus mutuo sibi obuintibus(!) per contrarias rationes . . . disputatorum . . .’
2. A2r [Heimericus de Campo]: Promptuarium argumentorum. Incipit: ‘[P]roponam vobis probleuma quid si solueritis mihi inter septem dies conuiuii . . .’ On the authorship see H‑005.
3. K6v [Colophon.]
4. K7r ‘Conclusiones huius libelli per Lilium et Spineum alternatis vicibus proposite et disputate.’ Incipit: ‘Logica est principaliter de secundis intentionibus. Logica est principaliter de primis intentionibus . . .’

Imprint:

Cologne: Heinrich Quentell, 4 Dec. 1496. 4°.

Collation:

A⁸ B–I⁶ K⁸. ‘Accipies' woodcut on A1r: see Schreiber–Heitz no. 18, and Schramm pl. 484, not 485 as on p. 23.

References:

Source: Bodleian ISTC: ih00010600 H *13397; Goff P‑1013; BMC I 286; Pr 1337; BSB‑Ink H‑233; Schramm VIII pl. 484; Schreiber V 5022a; Sheppard 1029; Voulliéme, Köln, 979, 981. Voulliéme treats the first gathering separately (979), suggesting that the edition might have remained uncompleted, as no setting from this date of the remaining gatherings seems to be known. LCN: 14087111

Copies:

1. H-006(1) Copy Bound with A‑203(2); see there for details of binding and provenance. Size of leaf: 182 × 132 mm. On K7v a medical recipe in English in a sixteenth-century hand, entitled ‘A gud medicyne for eyeord(?) or fleyme in the eye', ‘ . . . pro oculis [ ] non possent videre': ‘Take iii sponfull of juse of celydon [greater celandine] & iii sponfull of juse of syphel and stren yam ons or twise througth a smale lyne clothe and take a sponfull of hony and clarified yt on ye fyer & stomyt it cleyn and then bule in juse aforsayde, & it togyder & put in to it a mit great of whyte toperose & then put it in a vessell & put it in to eyes when you gothe to bede or any other tyme'. On the rear endleaf, a philosophical quaestio in a later hand, ‘An potentia sit de essentia materiæ . . .' On the verso of the rear endleaf a philosophical quaestio written in a sixteenth-century hand, entitled incipit: ‘An potentia sit de essentia materiæ. Arguitur quod non . . .’ SHELFMARK: Auct. 2Q 5.2(4).